The world of SSL/TLS certificates is about to undergo its most significant transformation in over a decade. Following a lengthy, and often heated debate among all domain name and security stakeholders, a decision has been approved via a member ballot at the CA/Browser Forum, to reduce the maximum validity period for publicly trusted SSL/TLS certificates in phases, ending with a maximum certificate length of just 47 days by 2029.
Here’s what’s changing, why it matters, and how Com Laude recommends preparing your domain portfolio to ensure you remain present and protected as the landscape shifts.
What are the proposed changes?
The new rules, driven by the leading browser vendors and certificate authorities, will take effect in three key phases:
Alongside certificate lifespan reductions, the periods for reusing domain (DV) and organization validation (OV) data will also shrink. For example, domain validation data reuse will drop to 200 days in 2026, 100 days in 2027, and just 10 days by 2029.
What is driving these changes?
The primary goal of the changes is to enhance online security and consumer trust. Shorter certificate lifespans mean that if a certificate or its private key is compromised, the opportunity for nefarious actions is dramatically reduced. It also encourages the need for automation in terms of certificate issuance and renewal, reducing the risk of outages and reputational issues from expired certificates.
What does this mean for domain owners and enterprises?
How should organisations prepare?
Summary
The move to shorter SSL/TLS certificate validity is a compelling event for digital security and trust. While it will bring some operational challenges, it also offers an opportunity to revisit and document your domain management practices. Com Laude has the expertise to help clients navigate these changes—ensuring your online presence remains present and protected in the years ahead.
For more information or to discuss how Com Laude can support your certificate management strategy, contact our team of experts today.
The first of a series of unique cases showing how complex and intriguing domain name disputes can be.